Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687415

ABSTRACT

Hypothermia during obstetric spinal anaesthesia is a common and important problem, yet temperature monitoring is often not performed due to the lack of a suitable, cost-effective monitor. This study aimed to compare a noninvasive core temperature monitor with two readily available peripheral temperature monitors during obstetric spinal anaesthesia. We undertook a prospective observational study including elective and emergency caesarean deliveries, to determine the agreement between affordable reusable surface temperature monitors (Welch Allyn SureTemp® Plus oral thermometer and the Braun 3-in-1 No Touch infrared thermometer) and the Dräger T-core© (using dual-sensor heat flux technology), in detecting thermoregulatory changes during obstetric spinal anaesthesia. Predetermined clinically relevant limits of agreement (LOA) were set at ± 0.5 °C. We included 166 patients in our analysis. Hypothermia (heat flux temperature < 36 °C) occurred in 67% (95% CI 49 to 78%). There was poor agreement between devices. In the Bland-Altman analysis, LOA for the heat flux monitor vs. oral thermometer were 1.8 °C (CI 1.7 to 2.0 °C; bias 0.5 °C), for heat flux monitor vs. infrared thermometer LOA were 2.3 °C (CI 2.1 to 2.4 °C; bias 0.4 °C) and for infrared vs. oral thermometer, LOA were 2.0 °C (CI 1.9 to 2.2 °C; bias 0.1 °C). Error grid analysis highlighted a large amount of clinical disagreement between methods. While monitoring of core temperature during obstetric spinal anaesthesia is clinically important, agreement between monitors was below clinically acceptable limits. Future research with gold-standard temperature monitors and exploration of causes of sensor divergence is needed.

3.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 54: 103648, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36930996

ABSTRACT

South Africa is classified as a low- and middle-income country, with a complex mixture of resource-rich and resource-limited settings. In the major referral hospitals, the necessary skill level exists for the management of complex challenges. However, this contrasts with the frequently-inadequate skill levels of anaesthesia practitioners in resource-limited environments. In Japan, obstetricians administer anaesthesia for 40% of caesarean deliveries and 80% of labour analgesia. Centralisation of delivery facilities is now occurring and it is expected that obstetric anaesthesiologists will be available 24 h a day in centralised facilities in the future. In China, improvements in women's reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health are critical government policies. Obstetric anaesthesia, especially labour analgesia, has received unprecedented attention. Chinese obstetric anaesthesiologists are passionate about clinical research, focusing on efficacy, safety, and topical issues. The Latin-American region has different landscapes, people, languages, and cultures, and is one of the world's regions with the most inequality. There are large gaps in research, knowledge, and health services, and the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists is committed to working with governmental and non-governmental organisations to improve patient care and access to safe anaesthesia. Anaesthesia workforce challenges, exacerbated by coronavirus disease 2019, beset North American healthcare. Pre-existing struggles by governments and decision-makers to improve health care access remain, partly due to unfamiliarity with the role of the anaesthesiologist. In addition to weaknesses in work environments and dated standards of work culture, the work-life balance demanded by new generations of anaesthesiologists must be acknowledged.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical , COVID-19 , Pregnancy , Adolescent , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Female , Latin America , Japan , South Africa , China , North America
4.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 45: 41-48, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In South Africa, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are the leading cause of maternal mortality. More than 50% of anaesthesia-related maternal deaths are attributed to complications of airway management. We compared the prevalence and risk factors for hypoxaemia during induction of general anaesthesia in parturients with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We hypothesised that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with desaturation during tracheal intubation. METHODS: Data from 402 cases in a multicentre obstetric airway management registry were analysed. The prevalence of peri-induction hypoxaemia (SpO2 <90%) was compared in patients with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Quantile regression of SpO2 nadir was performed to identify confounding variables associated with, and mediators of, hypoxaemia. RESULTS: In the cohort of 402 cases, hypoxaemia occurred in 19% with and 9% without hypertension (estimated risk difference, 10%; 95% CI 2% to 17%; P=0.005). Quantile regression demonstrated a lower SpO2 nadir associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy as body mass index increased. Room-air oxygen saturation, Mallampati grade, and number of intubation attempts were associated with the relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant oxygen desaturation during airway management occurred twice as often in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, compounded by increasing body mass index. Intermediary factors in the pathway from hypertension to hypoxaemia were also identified.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Airway Management , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Hypoxia/epidemiology , Intubation, Intratracheal , Oxygen Saturation , Pregnancy , Registries
5.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 44: 81-89, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32823251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting is one of the most common anaesthetic complications of caesarean section. This study examined the association between hyperemesis gravidarum during pregnancy and nausea and vomiting after caesarean section. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study, using electronic databases of patients with and without hyperemesis gravidarum, undergoing caesarean section from 2015 to 2019. The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting were established by a review of the documentation of administration of postoperative anti-emetics within the 24-h period after surgery, and examined using univariable, multivariable binary and ordered logistic regression models. RESULTS: Data were compared for 76 patients with hyperemesis gravidarum and 315 patients without the condition. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the hyperemesis group versus the non-hyperemesis group was 43.4% vs 29.6%, respectively. The odds of experiencing postoperative nausea and vomiting was 1.95 times higher in women with hyperemesis gravidarum than in those without (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.36, P=0.016). The odds of having more severe postoperative nausea and vomiting were greater in the hyperemesis gravidarum group (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.20, P=0.014). CONCLUSION: Patients with hyperemesis gravidarum are more likely to develop nausea and vomiting after caesarean section, and this is likely to be of greater severity than in those without the condition. This finding should assist the effective provision of intra-operative and postoperative anti-emetics for patients with hyperemesis gravidarum undergoing caesarean section.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Hyperemesis Gravidarum/epidemiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Anaesthesia ; 75(4): 487-492, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811659

ABSTRACT

Spinal hypotension is a common and clinically important problem during caesarean section. Current consensus recommendations for resource-rich settings suggest the use of a titrated phenylephrine infusion, in combination with fluid coloading, for prevention of maternal hypotension. In resource-limited settings, where syringe drivers are unavailable, these recommendations advise the addition of 500 µg phenylephrine to the first 1 l of intravenous fluid given after initiation of spinal anaesthesia, with additional vasopressor boluses as required. This prospective, alternating intervention study compared the use of a conventional phenylephrine rescue bolus strategy for prevention of hypotension, defined as systolic arterial pressure < 90 mmHg, with a phenylephrine infusion given according to the consensus recommendation. We studied 300 women having elective caesarean section. There were 77 (51%) women who developed hypotension in the bolus group vs. 55 (37%) in the phenylephrine infusion group (p = 0.011). This represented a 29% reduction in hypotension, with a number needed to treat of 6.8. The six highest systolic arterial pressure readings occurred in the phenylephrine infusion group (range 166-188 mmHg), and there were four instances of bradycardia (heart rate < 50 beats.min-1 ) with preserved systolic arterial pressure in each group. There were no adverse clinical sequelae, and no differences in neonatal Apgar scores in either group. The consensus recommendation for phenylephrine and fluid co-administration in resource-limited settings appears effective in preventing maternal hypotension, but at the cost of sporadic systolic hypertension.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Fluid Therapy/methods , Hypotension/prevention & control , Phenylephrine/therapeutic use , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Developing Countries , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Health Resources , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Phenylephrine/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , South Africa , Treatment Outcome , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage
9.
S Afr Med J ; 110(1): 65-68, 2019 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31865945

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anaemia has been shown to be an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Iron deficiency is the leading cause of anaemia globally. There are limited data describing the burden of perioperative anaemia and the relative contribution of iron deficiency in South Africa (SA). OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and severity of preoperative anaemia in adults presenting for elective surgery in Western Cape Province, SA, and to investigate the contribution of iron deficiency as a cause of the anaemia. For this purpose, an investigative protocol from a recent consensus statement on the management of perioperative anaemia was applied. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study in adult patients presenting for elective non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery over a 5-day period at six Western Cape government-funded hospitals. The World Health Organization patient classification was applied, and patients with anaemia were investigated for iron deficiency. RESULTS: The prevalence of preoperative anaemia was 28% (105/375; 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.5 - 32.5); 55/105 patients (52%) had moderate and 11/105 (11%) severe anaemia. Iron deficiency was the cause of anaemia in 37% (32/87; 95% CI 26.6 - 46.9), but only 9% of iron-deficient patients received iron supplementation prior to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anaemia was common in this study, and more than half of the affected patients had moderate to severe anaemia. Iron deficiency was responsible for almost 40% of cases. Iron supplementation was under-utilised in the preoperative period as a means of increasing haemoglobin. The introduction of system-wide policies would empower perioperative physicians to mitigate the risk associated with preoperative anaemia in the Western Cape.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Adult , Aged , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/complications , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Preoperative Care/methods , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , South Africa/epidemiology
10.
S Afr Med J ; 109(10): 801-806, 2019 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31635579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common condition. The high burden of undiagnosed DM and a lack of large population studies make accurate prevalence estimations difficult, especially in the surgical environment. Furthermore, poorly controlled DM is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to establish the prevalence of DM in elective adult non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgical patients in hospitals in Western Cape Province, South Africa. The secondary objectives were to assess the glycaemic control and compliance with treatment of known diabetics. METHODS: A 5-day multicentre, prospective observational study was performed at six government-funded hospitals in the Western Cape. Screening for DM was done using finger-prick capillary blood glucose (CBG) testing. Patients found to have a CBG ≥6.5 mmol/L had their glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level measured. DM was diagnosed based on the Society for Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa (SEMDSA) diagnostic criteria. Patients known to have DM had their HbA1cmeasured and completed a Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4) questionnaire to assess glycaemic control and compliance with treatment. RESULTS: Of the 379 participants, 61 were known diabetics (16.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.4 - 19.8). After exclusion of 8 patients with incomplete results, a new diagnosis of DM was made in 5/310 patients (1.6%; 95% CI 0.2 - 3.0). The overall prevalence of DM was 17.8% (66/371; 95% CI 13.9 - 21.7). HbA1c results were available for 57 (93.4%) of the 61 known diabetics. Of these, 27 (47.4%; 95% CI 34.4 - 60.3) had an HbA1c level ≥8.5% and 14 (24.6%; 95% CI 13.4 - 35.8) had a level ≤7%. Based on positive responses to two or more questions on the MMAS-4 questionnaire, 12/60 participants (20.0%) were deemed non-compliant. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low rate of undiagnosed DM in our elective surgical population, but in a high proportion of patients with DM the condition is poorly controlled. Poorly controlled DM is known to increase postoperative complications and is likely to increase the burden of perioperative care. Resources should be focused on improvement of long-term glycaemic control in patients presenting for elective surgery.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , South Africa , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Anaesthesia ; 74(10): 1305-1319, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31347151

ABSTRACT

It is routine to give a uterotonic drug following delivery of the neonate during caesarean section. However, there is much heterogeneity in the relevant research, which has largely been performed in low-risk elective cases or women with uncomplicated labour. This is reflected in considerable variation in clinical practice. There are significant differences between dose requirements during elective and intrapartum caesarean section. Standard recommended doses are higher than required, with the potential for acute cardiovascular adverse effects. We recommend a small initial bolus dose of oxytocin, followed by a titrated infusion. The recommended doses of oxytocin may have to be increased in women with risk factors for uterine atony. Carbetocin at equipotent doses to oxytocin has similar actions, while avoiding the requirement for a continuous infusion after the initial dose and reducing the need for additional uterotonics. As with oxytocin, carbetocin dose requirements are higher for intrapartum caesarean sections. A second-line agent should be considered early if oxytocin/carbetocin fails to produce good uterine tone. Women with cardiac disease may be very sensitive to the adverse effects of oxytocin and other uterotonics, and their management needs to be individualised.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Oxytocics/therapeutic use , Adult , Consensus , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Oxytocics/adverse effects , Oxytocin/adverse effects , Oxytocin/analogs & derivatives , Oxytocin/therapeutic use , Pregnancy
12.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 40: 119-127, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31230992

ABSTRACT

Post-caesarean pain is an important and often neglected outcome. It causes suffering, affects breastfeeding and is associated with postpartum depression and the development of chronic pain syndromes. Pain control is often difficult even in resource-rich environments; it is likely far worse in resource-limited settings, where emphasis is on reducing the high maternal mortality rate. Lack of adequate staffing, education, and postoperative monitoring severely limit the options in resource-limited settings. Resource-limited settings are further compromised by limited access to essential analgesic drugs and equipment for their administration. Solutions using affordable and accessible medications as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy are possible, supplemented by education and training programmes. More research is required, both to establish current practice and to test methods for improving maternal pain control. While government involvement is necessary to improve infrastructure and resources in individual countries, other solutions should also be sought, empowering local institutions and harnessing individual cultural characteristics.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Cesarean Section , Developing Countries , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Poverty , Pregnancy
13.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 37: 86-95, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30482717

ABSTRACT

Maternal critical care reflects interdisciplinary care in any hospital area according to the severity of illness of the pregnant woman. The admission rate to intensive care units is below 1% (0.08-0.76%) of deliveries in high-income countries, and ranges from 0.13% to 4.6% in low- and middle-income countries. Mortality in these patients is high and varies from 0% to 4.9% of admissions in high-income countries, and from 2% to 43.6% in low- and middle-income countries. Obstetric haemorrhage, sepsis, preeclampsia, human immunodeficiency virus complications and tropical diseases are the main reasons for intensive care unit admission in low middle-income countries. Bedside assessment tools, such as early warning scores, may help to identify critically ill patients and those at risk of deterioration. There is a lack of uniformity in definitions, identification and treatment of critically ill pregnant patients, especially in resource-limited settings. Our aims were to (i) propose a more practical definition of maternal critical care, (ii) discuss maternal mortality in the setting of limited accessibility of critical care units, (iii) provide some accessible tools to improve identification of obstetric patients who may become critically ill, and (iv) confront challenges in providing maternal critical care in resource-limited settings. To improve maternal critical care, training programmes should embrace modern technological educational aids and incorporate new tools and technologies that assist prediction of critical illness in the pregnant patient. The goal must be improved outcomes following early interventions, early initiation of resuscitation, and early transfer to an appropriate level of care, whenever possible.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Health Resources , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Income , Intensive Care Units , Maternal Mortality , Pregnancy
14.
S Afr Med J ; 108(5): 408-412, 2018 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29843855

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is a newly recognised entity identified as an independent risk factor associated with increased 30-day all-cause mortality. MINS increases the risk of death in the perioperative period by ~10-fold. More than 80% of patients with MINS are asymptomatic, so the majority of diagnoses are missed. Awareness of MINS is therefore important for perioperative physicians. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of MINS after elective elevated-risk non-cardiac surgery at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa (SA). METHODS: Patients aged ≥45 years undergoing elective elevated-risk non-cardiac surgery were enrolled via convenience sampling. The new fifth-generation high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T blood test was used postoperatively to identify MINS. Preoperative troponin levels were not measured. RESULTS: Among 244 patients included in the study, the incidence of MINS was 4.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8 - 8.5), which was not significantly different from that in a major international prospective observational study (VISION) (8.0% (95% CI 7.5 - 8.4)); p=0.080. CONCLUSIONS: Our SA cohort had a lower cardiovascular risk profile but a similar incidence of MINS to that described in international literature. The impact of MINS on morbidity and mortality is therefore likely to be proportionally higher in SA than in published international studies. The limited sample size and lower event rate weaken our conclusions. Larger studies are required to establish patient and surgical risk factors for MINS, allowing for revision of cardiovascular risk prediction models in SA.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Heart Injuries , Intraoperative Complications , Postoperative Complications , Aged , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Injuries/diagnosis , Heart Injuries/epidemiology , Heart Injuries/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Risk Factors , South Africa/epidemiology , Troponin T
15.
Anaesthesia ; 73(6): 791-792, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29747225
16.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 34: 85-95, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal fluid management strategy to ensure best outcomes in preeclamptic patients remains a controversial issue, with little evidence to support any one approach. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of various fluid management strategies on clinical outcomes, haemodynamic indices and biochemical markers in preeclamptic women and their babies. Primary outcome measures were the occurrence of pulmonary oedema and/or the development of renal impairment. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised fluid management strategies was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched using the expanded search terms: 'intravenous fluid', 'plasma substitutes', 'intravenous fluid management', 'intravenous fluid therapy', plasma volume expansion', 'fluid restriction', 'oncotic therapy', 'crystalloids', 'colloids', 'preeclampsia', 'toxemia of pregnancy', 'pregnancy-induced hypertension', 'eclampsia' and 'gestational proteinuric hypertension'. RESULTS: Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), from nine publications, were included in the final analysis. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence of pulmonary oedema, perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and caesarean section. Colloid volume expansion was associated with a significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but had no effect on heart rate or cardiac index. Data on systemic vascular resistance (SVR), serum atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and urine volume could not be aggregated. CONCLUSION: Data on the ideal fluid strategy in women with preeclampsia is limited, and insufficient to make any strong recommendations. Further randomised controlled studies are needed to provide more evidence for which fluid management strategies are best suited to this heterogeneous patient group.


Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy/methods , Pre-Eclampsia/therapy , Adult , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy
17.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 33: 23-31, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28899735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies in healthy patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery show that, compared with phenylephrine, ephedrine used to treat spinal hypotension is associated with increased fetal acidosis. This has not been investigated prospectively in women with severe preeclampsia. METHODS: Patients with preeclampsia requiring caesarean delivery for a non-reassuring fetal heart tracing were randomised to receive either bolus ephedrine (7.5-15mg) or phenylephrine (50-100µg), to treat spinal hypotension. The primary outcome was umbilical arterial base excess. Secondary outcomes were umbilical arterial and venous pH and lactate concentration, venous base excess, and Apgar scores. RESULTS: Among 133 women, 64 who required vasopressor treatment were randomised into groups of 32 with similar patient characteristics. Pre-delivery blood pressure changes were similar. There was no difference in mean [standard deviation] umbilical artery base excess (-4.9 [3.7] vs -6.0 [4.6] mmol/L for ephedrine and phenylephrine respectively; P=0.29). Mean umbilical arterial and venous pH and lactate concentrations did not significantly differ between groups (7.25 [0.08] vs 7.22 [0.10], 7.28 [0.07] vs 7.27 [0.10], and 3.41 [2.18] vs 3.28 [2.44] mmol/L respectively). Umbilical venous oxygen tension was higher in the ephedrine group (2.8 [0.7] vs 2.4 [0.62]) kPa, P=0.02). There was no difference in 1- or 5-min Apgar scores, numbers of neonates with 1-min Apgar scores <7 or with a pH <7.2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe preeclampsia and fetal compromise, fetal acid-base status is independent of the use of bolus ephedrine versus phenylephrine to treat spinal hypotension.


Subject(s)
Ephedrine/administration & dosage , Ephedrine/therapeutic use , Fetal Diseases/drug therapy , Hypotension/drug therapy , Phenylephrine/administration & dosage , Phenylephrine/therapeutic use , Pre-Eclampsia/drug therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Acidosis/complications , Adult , Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Blood Pressure , Cesarean Section , Female , Fetal Blood/chemistry , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Infant, Newborn , Lactic Acid/blood , Oxygen/blood , Pregnancy , Young Adult
18.
Anaesthesia ; 73(1): 23-31, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086911

ABSTRACT

We examined the haemodynamic effects of colloid preload, and phenylephrine and ephedrine administered for spinal hypotension, during caesarean section in 42 women with severe early onset pre-eclampsia. Twenty patients with pre-delivery spinal hypotension were randomly allocated to receive an initial dose of either 50 µg phenylephrine or 7.5 mg ephedrine; the primary outcome was percentage change in cardiac index. After a 300-ml colloid preload, mean (SD) cardiac index increased from 4.9 (1.1) to 5.6 (1.2) l.min-1 .m-2 (p < 0.01), resulting from an increase in both heart rate, from 81.3 (17.2) to 86.3 (16.5) beats.min-1 (p = 0.2), and stroke volume, from 111.8 (19.0) to 119.8 (17.9) ml (p = 0.049). Fourteen (33%) and 23 (54.8%) patients exhibited a stroke volume response > 10% and > 5%, respectively; a significant negative correlation was found between heart rate and stroke volume changes. Spinal hypotension in 20 patients was associated with an increase from baseline in cardiac index of 0.6 l.min-1 .m-2 (mean difference 11.5%; p < 0.0001). After a median [range] dose of 50 [50-150] µg phenylephrine or 15 [7.5-37.5] mg ephedrine, the percentage change in cardiac index during the measurement period of 150 s was greater, and negative, in patients receiving phenylephrine vs. ephedrine, at -12.0 (7.3)% vs. 2.6 (6.0)%, respectively (p = 0.0001). The percentage change in heart rate after vasopressor was higher in patients receiving phenylephrine, at -9.1 (3.4)% vs. 5.3 (12.6)% (p = 0.0027), as was the change in systemic vascular resistance, at 22.3 (7.5) vs. -1.9 (10.5)% (p < 0.0001). Phenylephrine effectively reverses spinal anaesthesia-induced haemodynamic changes in severe pre-eclampsia, if left ventricular systolic function is preserved.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Anesthesia, Spinal , Cardiac Output/drug effects , Cesarean Section , Hypotension/drug therapy , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Colloids , Ephedrine/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hypotension/complications , Hypotension/physiopathology , Mothers , Phenylephrine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...